Victoria Nikiforova
Only together can states preserve their sovereignty and ensure
real security for themselves and for the entire planet.
Quite naturally, people move towards authority. Even people who want to do bad things move towards the most odious bad-deed-doer they can find in order to bask in their aura of authority.
The reason for this is simple. People want to be safe, and their own nature tells them that someone who has authority can protect them from danger, can give them the safety they crave.
Accordingly, people look for two signs that someone has authority sufficient to keep them safe.
One sign is their moral character, because a person’s moral architecture — whether for goodness or badness — is material protection for those who affix to them for their own safety.
The other sign is their military capability, because a person’s military architecture — again, whether for goodness or badness — also provides material protection for those seeking safety.
It is not clear to everyone, at first thought, that moral and military architectures for goodness make genuine safety whereas those for badness make counterfeits of safety. But it is clear soon enough, albeit many today refuse on ideological and / or chemically induced grounds to believe that to be so. In consequence, these ones fail to act for their safety even when given the evidence of own eyes.
When a nation loses strength of moral and military architectures, other nations shun them because they lack authority to protect those other nations.
A full pond gathers frogs who sing lustily.
No frogs gather about a dry pond.
The USG and NATO vassals have renounced their historic strengths in moral and military architectures. Their authority is gone with that improper renunciation. They can damage now. They can harm. They cannot attract loyalty or build cooperative reciprocity. Their prestige has vanished. They drag US-Americans and The USofA herself down with them into the pit of revilement. Renunciation of moral and military excellence does this to one.
Russia, both government and citizens, have restored their historic strength in moral and military architectures. In consequence, Russia has authority. This fact induces other nations to repair to Russia for safety. Russian prestige is high. Her moral and military excellence makes this happen.
The phenomenon is only natural. It’s the way the world always works. The USG thought they knew a better way. Nope.
Alexander Yakovenko
Historically, Russia, whether it is aware of it or not, has invariably put its sovereignty at the service of all mankind. The final emancipation of the world from Western colonialism and imperialism is inconceivable without a sovereign Russia, which is self-sufficient precisely to oppose Western policy in all its manifestations.
Now what?
Well, clearly, The USofA must restore her moral character and military capability. But before we can do that, we have another task: we must decide — accurately — what our military capability is FOR.
Restoring our moral character, I posit, will show us what comprises restoring our military capability. So: moral character first, military architecture second. In what does this consist?
First, keep the word once given.
Second, honor and care for children, parents, and elderly.
Third and everywhere, practice in essentials unity; in non-essentials liberty, and in all things love.
Fourth, mind your own business, go not abroad searching for friends or enemies of The USofA.
Fifth, honor the right of all nations to self-determination.
Sixth, seek your own and our own salvation with the greatest possible patience, persistence, assiduity, and carefulness.
Seventh, in family, neighborhood, town, city, county, state, and nation, practice unity. Never insist.
That in place — itself a decades-long learning / engineering process — architectural restoration of military capability will proceed, in general outline, among these contours:
First, abolish The US Joint Chiefs of Staff and The US Armed Forces. Create in their stead The US General Staff and The US Joint Force.
Second, assign operational command and control of The US Joint Force to The US General Staff.
Third, take the US Defense Industry into US state ownership as property assigned for use by The US General Staff.
Fourth, constantly re-design and re-task The US Joint Force for combat effectiveness in current actual conditions rather than for sophistication in current market volatilities. National defense is a job the nation does for herself. The job reliably will not be done by an organization tuned for private profit.
Fifth, constantly re-design and re-task The US Joint Force as ISR-Strike Complexes for homeland defense rather than as expeditionary conflict assets for overseas adventures. The USofA cannot and need not conduct modern warfare off The American Continent.
Sixth, task USCOCOMs to redeploy and disband their HQs.
Seventh, fold USCOCOM ISR assets into the G-2 shops of The US General Staff, to act as their forward-looking — but not forward-deployed — ISR.
Talleyrand
C'est pire qu'un crime, c'est une faute.
"It's worse than a crime, it's a gross mistake.”
This describes Zionist statecraft in the US-UK-EU-Levant.
Napoleon Bonaparte observed the truth: Moral : Material :: 3 : 1.
Moral and military architectures share a unique and salutary relationship:
The moral is a material force. The material is a moral force.
If your moral force goes down, your material force goes down with it.
If your material force goes up, your moral force goes up with it.
Material force and moral force are inextricable.
They cannot be separated. If you lose one, you’ve lost both. To have one, you must cultivate both.
Sathya Sai Baba
What we do is to project an ideal into action, into a concrete program. The external action or achievement is only a reflection of the Inner Being, which frames the ideas and concepts. So, the transformation and refinement have to be done in the inner region of the mind. Constant reflection on the glory of God helps to transmute the body, mind and spirit.