Vicki Nuland took an ax,
And gave the Ukie’s forty whacks.
When she saw what she had done,
She gave her country forty one.
It is generally accepted, I think, that Rome fell because she became internally weak so that outsiders could overwhelm her.  I’ve never been satisfied with that construction.  It lacks sympathy for facts and motivations.  I think a more woke appreciation of events than described now as a fall is that Romans, Milanese, Soissons-ians, Hanovarians, Londoners, Alexandrians, Carthaginians, Barcelonians, and the rest resolved to abandon their imperial institutions of self-defense because those were hag-ridden by degenerates.
They went to creating successor institutions. Â They molted, in a manner of speaking. Â Learning they put into monasteries, to include the learning of military arts and sciences. Â Education and arts they put into families and craft guilds. Â Government they put into localized feudal and urban systems and then regionalized super-feudal structures, one in particular dating from 800 AD. Â Religion they put into a parallel feudal system which eventually (at Canossa), but not with perpetual efficacy, claimed to embody and so to represent the entire secular-spiritual (scientific-religious) unity the world is.
Rome did not fall. Â Romans were forced by the degeneracy of their own leadership to build fresh systems for their own self-protection. Â Rome did not expire. Â Quite the opposite. Â She molted. Â Romans decentralized, and that worked for quite a while. Â They could protect themselves. Â Then their descendants had to decentralize again, and for the same reason: degenerate leadership made self-protection impossible. Â Their construction that time was the nation state, the self-protection structure beyond feudal systems.
Now we’re sort of half-in/half-out of the nation state as an effective self-protection system.  Mostly out, I’d say, but not entirely.  And again for the same reason: degenerate leadership making self-protection by ourselves through our own institutions impossible.  So we descendants of Rome — say better, The Latin Church, Protestant and Roman — return to historical pattern to pursue our fundamental motivation, self-protection: we decentralize, yet again.
We reject the globalist/totalist/borderless vision — aka fratricide — preached by our own degenerate leadership and exert to reassert our national sovereignties as natural structures for self-protection.  A national border is a decentralizing mechanism against totalism, a self-protection device just as, at an earlier time, a feudal city was a self-protection device against marauders and a nation state was a self-protection device against feudal/titled aristocrats / oligarchs: princes and bishops.
Today, I think, we are adding an additional decentralizing self-protection structure to guard the sovereign nation state against totalism — i.e., Socialism-Globalism-Jihad — and that is the fair trade and mutual protection alliance between nation states — indivisible security, multivariance — any who wish to make and join their own. But three in particular are senior exemplars of the form: India, Russia, The USA.  We are molting, of necessity, again, for an effective self-protection construction.