The Problem

A Network Not A Person

Orlov, you tease a name and then don't give it. Am I right about that?

I think it's a network, not a name. I think the network works from a shared frame of reference, a common way of thinking. I think that common way of thinking is given by the network participants' use of psychotropic drugs.

I think the network is not the problem. I think drugs, promiscuity, and step parents are the problem. By step parents I mean new partners of parents who initiated divorce inside their families. A new partner of a parent who did not initiate divorce inside their family is not inherently deleterious to the children of that family.

You cannot talk to entities who elect themselves.

Today's AngloZionists, as they are dubbed here, fight under several banners. The Cross is not one of them. Deeming them Crusaders misleads the intellect. Today's AngloZionists are atheists. Their number includes numerous Catholics, mostly of the Jesuit orbit. Anglican-Jewish-Jesuit would be a more accurate descriptor for these personalities and their activities than AngloZionist. All of these are atheists. Most are red diaper babies or sons and daughters of the same. We call them, and they call themselves, Neocons. But their line of descent is Bolshevik and, for most, not ethnic Russian. Their proxies are Nazi and Jihadi atheists.

Vicki Nuland does not stand under The Cross when she makes her statements. Using verbal or graphic images of Crusaders to represent Anglican-Jewish-Jesuit activists is a sign that the user does not know their enemy.

War is fire and fire is the ultimate cleanser. When war occurs in which one side is so clearly in the right -- in this case, Russians -- and one side so clearly in the wrong -- in this case, Anglican-Jewish-Jesuit activists -- one perhaps is best advised to have faith that The Almighty has identified intolerable filth somewhere, and of an immensity one could not survive knowing face to face, and is resolved to burn it out as a service to one and all. In such as case as this of ours today, Russia and Russians -- who do live under The Cross -- deserve the honorific title of Crusader and the reverence rightly attending it.

"Green" is about depopulation, and that's all it's about.

Only a degenerate female would be so stupid as to blow Nord Stream gas lines. My immediate thought went to Truss, later to Nuland. Power and Monaco also would be in there. And some female(s) at CIA. And at think tanks left and right — doesn't matter which, they're all the same. No doubt men executed -- I'm going with SAS, Royal Navy, and Poles -- but the decision to execute, and the target to maul, is typical of degenerate females winging it more or less on their own.

It's common for commenters to refer to the US doing this, the US doing that. I have done that, contrite to say. But that locution is really inaccurate. Biden gang, or more broadly State/CIA gang, and more specifically Nuland-Power-someone(s) at CIA and think tanks gang, are doing this and doing that. These actors are not "the US." They are a clot of drug-addled self-aggrandizers scratching for mundane happiness and therefore always angry.

People comprising these decision-making decision centers think they represent America, are America, but they do not. They are not. The salient feature of the Biden/D.C. gang, other than their illegitimacy, is that they have no center.

They are collections of independent operators, each with a huge ego and budget -- CIA's is limitless and beyond scrutiny -- coordinated by back-chatter at university and D.C. drug, cocktail, and sex parties. Again, Biden/D.C. gang do not represent The USA. But they are a gang, a clot, self-organizing and criminal too.

We are different but we are not enemies.

Long ago, in Minneapolis, over lunch, a senior officer in federal service mentioned to me that his superiors and counterparts in D.C. were not serious about the major aspect of public and commercial safety it was his responsibility to ensure in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area.

This spring and summer I addended two political coffees in the Seattle area. At each, a candidate for the US House gave their pitch. The first, an electrical engineer, I asked what he thought is the US's place in the world. He gave the rote answers: beacon, city on a hill, exceptional, God's gift.

The second, a deputy sheriff and town council member, I interrupted about ten minutes in because he was addressing the ceiling and walls with rote RNC talking points: (1) horrible condition of US, (2) US is God's gift to man. He didn't acknowledge because his eyes were on walls and ceiling. I kept my hand raised and finally he saw it, halted, wondered, said he would answer questions at the end. I said, "Oh, I think you can answer my question now." He stood still, looked at me, halted, wondering, then relented.

I said, "On the one hand you say we are in terrible shape, and on the other hand you say we are a light to the nations. Which is it?" He glared, halted, wondered, said he did not want to discuss that now, that he will get back to his speech. He did and never addressed my question. But everybody in the room knew, including him, that the point had been made: he can't handle a paradox, shuns VUCA, lacks leader temperament.

I don't care whether the country is serious or unserious. I don't care if its / we're a country even. I don't care if nobody answers my questions or somebody does. (BTW, if I'm a Republican, is a Democrat my countryman?). None of that matters to me. But I do care whether someone talking to me looks at me. That I care about. If they don't look at me, I know they don't care about me.

I won't vote for a Democrat. But also I won't vote for a Republican who doesn't look at me when they're talking to me. And as for professors, frankly, the last one I remember looking at me -- at me -- was a good man, a man, an historian named Gaustad, Ed Gaustad, and that was in 1961, before he moved to Riverside.

One doesn't behave like a jerk and expect those on the receiving end to like you, not unless you're certifiable to begin with.

We do not, any of us, know the future. We should not, any of us, fear the future. We are, each of us, the future as much as we are, each of us, the past.

The question is, Where does authority reside? The answer is, Authority resides in the heart of the one who takes care of their people, be that self, family, corporation, town, state, or nation. Find that one and give them allegiance. That be the future, and one be satisfied now feeling that one has made it.

Satisfied or no, what one makes now one must live later. Make what makes happy now and one will meet future happiness.

Maria Zakharova
”Washington lacks internal and legitimate external resources for its own development and to overcome its economic and political crisis.
So, they have turned to unlawful actions.”

Upon their first day in office, the next actual POTUS -- I don't know who that is or when they show up for service -- will summon oligarchs of all nationalities who own or control investments in property in The USA, and whose globe-wide gross wealth exceeds $300M, to hand over to The US Treasury, within one month's time, monies equalling three quarters of their globe-wide gross wealth, on pain of prosecution for long years of potpourri criminality and punishment by sentence to lifetime in prison, at least.

Andrei Martyanov
The Russian operational and strategic mind
differs drastically from its American counter-part.

The Russian government plans to achieve maximum results by 2030 through a new socio-economic program, which has been under development since July. It includes several blocks for which targets have been set.

Considerable stakes are being placed on the active development of transport and logistics infrastructure in order to ensure the reorientation of import and export flows from west to east, implement a policy of import substitution, achieve Russia’s technological self-sufficiency, introduce its own analogues of foreign software (software), stimulate the private investment climate and strengthen the stock market.

The government is also counting on increasing the territorial mobility of the population and the intersectoral transit of labor. The priority is to change the structure of secondary specialized and additional education to meet the new needs associated with global economic challenges and the need to implement the economic security of Russia.

Teleology moves by its own internal power,
not by approval ratings, to fulfill all potentialities.

Doctrine-mongering in The USA occurs because self-announced leader cadre, civilian and military, do not understand enemies they deem they face, e.g., Russia and China.

Learning the language does not make one Russian or Chinese. It doesn't tell one how Russians fight and why and to what end. Only feeling the culture can do that. Current US self-announced leader cadre do not know to feel culture. They think GDP and other superfluities. They do not know how to fight a real war, therefore, nor have they tool credibly to fight one with serious defensive capability. Current US self-announced leader cadre do not know what combined arms warfare at scale really is. They have never fought that way, and still do not, preferring to waste proxies rather than step up themselves.

Thus, the look and feel of their decrepit degeneracy. Thus also their doctrine-mongering to cover ignorance, hide cowardice, and make careers rather than protect and defend their nation.