US Military-Industrial Architecture
Requires Redesign, Not Improvement
The USofA require an entirely new military-industrial architecture. It must respond to demonstrable realities rather than to tendentious fantasies (ideologies and habits of mind).
Improvements, such as those led by GEN Abrams after Vietnam, are insufficient. A complete new redesign is required, and that for a single, fully-networked Combined Arms Force supported by a military-industrial base motivated to protect US national sovereignty rather than to pile up private profits.
Moreover. Evidence — not false flags and IO — must be adduced to justify the US electorate's maintenance of a US military-industrial architecture at all. And that must be agreed by the US electorate altogether.
There is not going to be any US national security unless the whole US is in on it and knows what is going on, can see it and feel it happening. Settled Grand National Strategic Interests precede and forge the engineering of US armed force TOEs.
This isn't about money. It isn't about power, name, or fame. It isn’t about prestige. It’s about spirit and hard work -- and the simplicity of truthfulness -- and a great power nation enjoying integral communication with -- not threatening or dominating -- every other nation, small, large, or great power as they may be.
